Canadian Counter-Dictionary, and Human Rights' Violations in Canada
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Major Nourhaghighi's $12,200,000.00 Pending Lawsuit before
the Ontario Superior Court of Justice as against
Canadian Corrupt Pilots, Chief Judges, Judges, Lawyers
Court Reporters, Toronto Police, and
Corporations and Commissions
the Ontario Superior Court of Justice as against
Canadian Corrupt Pilots, Chief Judges, Judges, Lawyers
Court Reporters, Toronto Police, and
Corporations and Commissions
Proof of Service of Lawsuit to few Lawyers on the Recod
Major Nourhaghighi was successful to Obtain an Order from the Court that
the passage of Time has no effect and he can move anytime before a Judge
and ask for a trial date. However, as paragraph 100 indicates
Major Nourhaghighi is asking for removal of the British
Colonial System in Canada; thus under the name of
corrupt Queen Elizabeth II it is almost seems
impossible to get a Judgment against the
corrupt British Agents in Canada
the passage of Time has no effect and he can move anytime before a Judge
and ask for a trial date. However, as paragraph 100 indicates
Major Nourhaghighi is asking for removal of the British
Colonial System in Canada; thus under the name of
corrupt Queen Elizabeth II it is almost seems
impossible to get a Judgment against the
corrupt British Agents in Canada
NOTICE OF CLAIM filed by Clerk J Richards at 361 University Ave, Toronto on October 23, 1996
STATEMENT OF CLAIM dated November 19, 1996, served to all Defendants and filed on December 10, 1996
JURY NOTICE served to all Defendants and filed on December 23, 1996
REPLY to the Defendants' Defense filed on January 2, 1997
Few Corrupt Lawyers on the Record:
Borden & Elliot: Corrupt Lawyers Eric Hoaken; Sean L. Gosnell, and R. W. Traves
Smith Lyons: Corrupt Lawyers Karen P. Earl; and Graeme Mew
Blake, Cassels &Garydon: Corrupt Lawyer Micheal R. Stephenson
Cassels Brock & Blackwell: Corrupt Lawyer Arthur Hamilton
I filed this "pending" Lawsuit against corrupt Judges & lawyers of October 1996; whereas few Judges & Lawyers respected the "Conflict of Interest" law and made no interference with my files; However corrupt Judges Defendants Lampkin J, Doherty JA, McMurtry CJO, Dead Judge Lamer CJC and Lawyers Gosnell, Hoken and ex law firm Borden & ELLIOT did not respect the law and revengefully acted against me
Court File No: 96-CU-113026
ONTARIO COURT (General Division)
BETWEEN:
KEYVAN NOURHAGHIGHI; PLAINTIFF
Political Asylum Seeker as a Canadian-Since 1994
Political Asylum Seeker as a Canadian-Since 1994
-and-
BELL CANADA
THE SECRETARY GENERAL CANADIAN RADIO-TELEVISION
AND TELECOMMUNICATION COMMISSION; CANADA TRUST, THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA, CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE,OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CANADA;
DAVID TRAVIS, METROPOLITAN LICENSING COMMISSION,
DIAMOND TAXI, CO-OP TAXI, TAXI NEWS; RICHARD SCHOBESBERGER; GREG LONG, EMPLOYMENT AND IMMIGRATION CANADA; THE EATON, THE EATON’S CENTER; CARLOS M. MONSALVE, ANGUS McTAVISH, AIRLINE TRAINING RESOURCES; BRIAN CARLICK, JOAN WILLIAMS, TORONTO AIRWAYS LIMITED; PAUL J. BOND, AVIATION INTERNATIONAL (CANADA) INCORPORATION; BRAMPTON FLYING CLUB; ALICOS; RUI GREGORIO, JULIE KNIGHT, MARK WALSH, GARG BILLINGTON, CHRISTOPHER FERNANDEZ, SCOTT STEPHENS, JOHN BADOWSKI, PETER DOLAMORE, JOHN DENNIS, DONALD MANTLE, PUBLIC COMPLAINTS INVESTIGATION BUREAU, HOMES and ACCUSE DAVID BOOTHBY, METROPOLITAN TORONTO POLICE; OFFICE OF THE POLICE COMPLAINTS COMMISSIONER; PETER M. BLECHER, PAUL J. MULLER, E. T. FORMAN, MAUREEN GANS, THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS; DOCTOR’S HOSPITAL;SEAN L. GOSNELL, ERIC R. HOAKEN, BORDEN and ELLIOT; GRAEME MEW, SMITH LYONS; JACQUELINE WIGLE, H.W.O. DOYLE; JENNIFER WYATT, JASON KRAFT, GRAHAM BORTON, CHERUL McCACMONT, GAIL DOBENY, ALLAN SCOTT, SUZANNE LaVIGNE, JOHN KROMKAMPT,
JOSEPH CIRASO, T.E. BURTON, MICHAEL CODE, MARIE CARDNO, DONNA JOHANSTON, HUGETTE MALYON, MANDEL, KAIM MADIGAN, IAN MCNISH, J. JOSEPH, CHARLES HARNICK, MINISTRY OF ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ONTARIO; JANICE MACKINTOSH, FERN KIRSCH, ONTARIO INSURANCE COMMISSION, ALFRED SHUAL, PAMELA THOMSON, ACCUSED VIBERT A. LAMPKIN, RAMEZ KHAWLY, DONALD GRAHAM, ACCUSED ROBERT G. BIGELOW, ACCUSED HENRY N.R. JACKMAN,OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUDGE OF ONTARIO COURT, OFFICE OF THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF ONATRIO; MICHAEL D. HARRIS, BURCE C. HAWKINS, ACCUSED AURTHOR C. WHEALY, OFFICE OF THE ASSOCIATE CHIEF JUSTICE OF ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTIICE, MARC DAMBORT, JEAN L. MACFARLAND, KEITH GIBSON, DONNA HALEY,
OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL SENIOR JUSTICE OF ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE,
ACCUSE ROY McMURTRY and OFFICE OF CJIEF JUSTICE OF ONTARIO;
ACCUSED ANTONIO LAMER and OFFICE OF CHIEF JUSTICE OF CANADA;
This is pending lawsuit before the Ontario Court, in Toronto
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
1. The Plaintiff Claims:
(a) An interim and permanent injunction and orders preventing the Defendants and their parties and agents from the following criminal acts against the Plaintiff and his family:
(1)- assault and battery;
(a) An interim and permanent injunction and orders preventing the Defendants and their parties and agents from the following criminal acts against the Plaintiff and his family:
(1)- assault and battery;
(2) interferences and interceptions of the Plaintiff's:
I- communications, telephone, mails, businesses with Courts and Lawyers, doctors and banks, and others;
II- medical cares, banks accounts, services to be render;
III- domestic relations and contracts;
IV- files at offices and abuse of court process
V- files at hearings and abuse of administration of Justice
VI- files at trials and conspiracy with his witnesses;
VII- employment relations;
I- communications, telephone, mails, businesses with Courts and Lawyers, doctors and banks, and others;
II- medical cares, banks accounts, services to be render;
III- domestic relations and contracts;
IV- files at offices and abuse of court process
V- files at hearings and abuse of administration of Justice
VI- files at trials and conspiracy with his witnesses;
VII- employment relations;
(3)- continuous malicious prosecutions and conspiracies for planting new causes of offenses and charges:
(4)- continuous arbitrary and unwarranted discretion of officials and judges;
(5)- continuous harassment and intimidation by frivolous and vexatious applications;
(6)- continuous intentional infliction of nervous shock, malicious false arrests and false imprisonments;
(7)- continuous organized deceits, robberies, frauds, conversions, detinues, clapping, misrepresentations;
(8)-continuous maintenance and champerty;
(9)-continuous gossiping and defamations against the Plaintiff;
(10)- trial of this action by a jury against the Crown Defendants as one cause of action of chains of conspiracies
(c) Aggravated and Emotional Damages $5,000,000.00
(d) Special Damages $200,000.00
(e) Punitive and Exemplary Damages $5,000,000.00
(f) Interest on the aforesaid sums from the date that notice was given to the Defendants, until Judgment, pursuant to provisions of the Court of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, Chapter C.43 and amendments
(g) His costs of this action on a solicitor and client bases;
(h) Such further and other relief as to this Honourable Court may seem Just.
2. The Plaintiff is a single parent with two children and landed immigrants as conventional refugees who resides in one bedroom apartment under exercise room of the corrupted Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation Number 935 ("Condo 935"), in the City of Toronto, in the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, and was at all material times a Senior Fighter and Transport Pilot and officer of Iranian Air Force and Army, whose decisions and plans for joining to the Canadian Aviation Industries, Air Force and Transport Canada, were maliciously destroyed by conspiracies. ("Hereinafter "The Plaintiff Competition")
3. The Defendants, Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Ontario (the Crown in the right of Ontario") and e Defendants, Her Majesty the Queen in the Right of Canada (the Crown in the right of Canada") had constitutional power to run Canada in "Peace, Order, and good Government", that at all material times, are ignoring the nature of Canadian Federalism, and creating "Fights and Disorders" for personal illegal benefits as the worse corrupted Governments TRAITOR to the Canadian Confederation.
4. The Defendants, ACCUSE Allan Rock and Ministry of Justice and Attorney General of Canada (the "Ministry of Justice"), ACCUSE Antonio Lamer and Office of Chief Justice of Canada, Charles Harnick and Ministry of Attorney General of Ontario (the "Ministry of Attorney"), ACCUSE R. Roy McMurtry and Office of Chief Justice of Ontario (the System"); is responsible in law to administrate the courts and justice systems according to rule of law; who has spent, fraudulently and maliciously about $100 Billion Dollars in last ten years, for Administration of Justice; while, in "CANADA" with this level of high education, the total costs should not exceed more than one Billion Dollars. The System, works in the same principle as a atomic reactor may operate; in 1991, a fraud in the accounts of Condo 935, has created tens of other actions to mislead the fact of frauds, a noise by-law charge against Condo 935, has created tens of proceedings, a motor vehicle accident was ended to uncountable trials and TORTURES and POISONING of the Plaintiff at Toronto Jail, and Old City Hall Jail. The System, is VERY aggravator.
4. The Defendants, ACCUSE Allan Rock and Ministry of Justice and Attorney General of Canada (the "Ministry of Justice"), ACCUSE Antonio Lamer and Office of Chief Justice of Canada, Charles Harnick and Ministry of Attorney General of Ontario (the "Ministry of Attorney"), ACCUSE R. Roy McMurtry and Office of Chief Justice of Ontario (the System"); is responsible in law to administrate the courts and justice systems according to rule of law; who has spent, fraudulently and maliciously about $100 Billion Dollars in last ten years, for Administration of Justice; while, in "CANADA" with this level of high education, the total costs should not exceed more than one Billion Dollars. The System, works in the same principle as a atomic reactor may operate; in 1991, a fraud in the accounts of Condo 935, has created tens of other actions to mislead the fact of frauds, a noise by-law charge against Condo 935, has created tens of proceedings, a motor vehicle accident was ended to uncountable trials and TORTURES and POISONING of the Plaintiff at Toronto Jail, and Old City Hall Jail. The System, is VERY aggravator.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16,
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52. As result of Travis' conduct, the Plaintiff sustained a chest pain, minor concussion, injuries in fingers and numerous contusions and lacerations to his back.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
72.
73.
74.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100. The System, is in breaches of the Canadian Constitutional Law, and all other Laws, Codes, Acts, Procedures, Regulations and Practice Direction, that may effects its, or its DISHONEST and CRIMINAL Parties. The System, is acting in the name of "Elizabeth the Second" and has destroyed the total lawfulness in Canada and Ontario, for which THE PUBLIC ELECTION with GRACE OF GOD WILL CHANGE THE FUTURE OF THIS LAND AS A "HOME" FOR EVERYONE AS IT WAS PROMISED TO BE.
101. THE DEFENDANTS' ACTIONS CONSTITUTE A GREAT DISASTERS FOR WHOLE HUMANITY and SO HIGH-HANDED, CALLOUS, BRUTAL, UNREASONABLE, WANTON AND SO OUTRAGEOUS disregard of the Plaintiff's rights, for which the Plaintiff entitle to an award of aggravated, punitive and exemplary damages.
The Plaintiff proposes that this action be tried at Toronto, Ontario.
DATED THIS NOVEMBER 19, 1996 Keyvan Nourhaghighi; 608-456 College Street, Toronto, ON, M6G 4A3
Bell Canada and Crimes in the Communications
****************
December 6, 1999
URGENT RESPONSE IS REQUIRED
The Secretary General Keyvan Nourhaghighi
Canadian Radio-television and 608-456 College StreetTelecommunications Commission Toronto On
Ottawa Ontario M6G 4A3
K1A 0N2
Via Facsimile: (819) 994 0218 transmission confirmed at 2:26:29 PM on Dec 6, 1999
Dear Sir:
References: Director’s response dated Nov 15, 1993, May 9, 1994
Lawsuit 96-CU-113026 Nourhaghighi v. Bell Canada, CRTTC et al
This is a serious complain against the Bell Canada for abuse of services to my telephone line (416) 515 7263, by committing the Criminal Offences of the interference, interception, wiretapping, pursuant to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Act, and Section 28(c) of the Federal Court Act.
Since October 1993, I have filed numerous complaints against the Criminal Offences committed by the Bell Canada against my telephone services, and never my grievances were ended to the proper Criminal Charges against Bell, nor a professional course of investigations by this office. Therefore, the nature of the complaints have remained same as it was before, only with advance technology has given the opportunity to perform wider Criminal Offences.
This complain, is related to the recent harassing calls that commenced on or about September 28, 1999, that I have received during days and midnight, when the Bell Canada’s Operators were telling me that: "You have a Long Distance Call from ...". But, soon the lines were disconnected. These, calls were serious concerns to me and my children as we felt that our relatives or friends are in difficult condition and trying to get the assistance from us.
On September 30, 1999, I made complain to the Bell’s Repair Services, Officer "Judy-6333" has got series of information from me and was satisfy that the line was tapped; after I explained for her that I could hear her voice very loud and clear[ Five for Loud, and Five for Clear: 5/5 ], while, in all other calls, the callers’ voices are very weak with background noises[One for Loud and three for Clear: 1/3].
On the same day, again, I had the same harassing call. Therefore, I call Metro Toronto Police, 14 Division; Officer Johnson-3962, provide me with some guides for proper steps, as soon as, if I got the harassing calls again, such as pressing certain stars’ numbers.
The Bell Canada did not send anyone to check the line on Sept 30, or in Sept 31.
On Sept 31, at about 4 PM I called 611. This time the Bell’s Operator was rude "Forith!" and did not give her name and number clearly, and tried for the discovery of my conversation with the police, and got all details of our conversation and the police instruction. Although, since than the Bell’s harassing calls were ceased! When I asked, why you did not send for Technician; she maliciously said: "On Sunday!", and soon disconnected the communications.
The Bell did not explain why I have to wait 96 Hours for the Wiretapping Inspection, which is required an urgent response when the complain is the criminal offence in nature!
On Sunday, October 3, at about 10:30 AM I called 611, the Operator who was very rude said that I have to wait from 9 AM to 5 PM till a repair staff attend for inspection. Her reply to all my questions was: "I don’t know!"; she did not give her name and her number and suddenly disconnected the communications. I called again 611, this time I wait for a long time till an operator replied. I asked to speak with the supervisor; when I wait again over twenty minutes till SUSAN-302 replied; I complained against misconduct of the operator at 10:30 AM. The Supervisor Susan, said that she would investigate and clearly stated: " The Repair Man is working outside of your building, You Can See Him from Window, and up to half an hour he would attend in your home. I called against at about 0:45 PM, after waiting fifteen minutes on hold, Susan-302, again fraudulently, stated that the Repair Man is working out side and will be soon in my Home to continue his job. As I find Susan was dishonest, and I told her that I would hold the Bell Canada’s nuisances as the intentional disturbances and interference with my private life, rest and enjoyment in Sunday.
At or about 5:30 PM, on Sunday October 3rd , the Bell Technician-Reaz, attended to my property for checking the lines. Mr. Reza said he was working in other place when he got 10 minutes ago a massage; he did not had any information about the complain and wiretapping, and said for inspection he need to have access to the Telephone Compartment of the Building, which was locked and the key was with the Superintendent, who was not working on Sunday!
This is not the first time that the Bell Canada had malicious and fraudulent misconduct for inspection process. All my private and business communications are under illegal and disturbing interceptions and for unlawful proposes; that includes continuous interference with transmissions of my facsimiles to the courts and judges.
On December 3rd, 1999, I called twice MBNA Canada 1-888-876-6262, when the Bell Canada ‘s recorder, fraudulently, stated: "The number that You are trying to reach is NOT in the service!". It was not the first time that I was hearing the said FALSE massage, I am familiar with this fraud for a long time, as the system will send a signal to a record to operate, than the connection will be possible. Therefore, I tried again, this time, the voice was dropped rapidly and MBNA operator answered to my inquires and asked for my account numbers, date of birth and my mother’s name, to allow me to have access to my account.
The Bell Canada by stealing my communications has caused me serious injuries and damages to all my interests, including my businesses with several banks and credit companies, by theft of my passwords and accounts numbers that have caused continuous errors in my accounts. As the results, the Bank of Nova Scotia and the Canadian Bank of Commerce were charged by the Ontario Courts for damages to me for said wrongs; when the said banks defendants, did not had a valid defence for continuous errors in my accounts. Several other banks will be charged for same cause of action. The Bell Canada misconduct has caused serious difficulties in all my communications, particularly, my legal communications with the courts; which is the obstruction of justice in nature. This Office was named defendant in two actions for refusing to enforce the Law against Bell Canada. If, I do not get proper answers to these grievances, I will move before the court for the Mandamus Order against this Office.
Sincerely
Keyvan Nourhaghighi
No comments:
Post a Comment